Submitted by Walter Ratcliff to the Modeling Working Team of the MLPA Scientific Advisory Team.
Gentlemen:
Following up on a comment made by  Dr. John Largier during the January 8 SAT meeting, this note is to support  including wind and coastal stewardship patterns in modeling fishing  effort.
We at Sail Rock Ranch are one of the  last few large intact coastal lands in sub-region 1.  At each MLPA meeting, we  have stood up to raise awareness about these de facto preserves.  We have  protected the land-sea interface off these properties for 80 plus years.  It  seems to us that the size-spacing scoring method used by itself enables—actually  encourages—the teams to put a new label—SMR, SMCA—on these areas without  substantive change in protection level for the sub-region.  In the SAT session,  we presented a map showing how the stakeholder proposals neatly avoid areas of  public access and target areas off these last undeveloped properties.  We fail  to see how this placement (which has been identified as a selection bias in the  literature) will improve habitat or fishery  outcomes.
We support the goals of MLPA.  As  conservationists and partners of DFG wardens of long standing, we want to see it  work.  We are concerned that the current MPA placements in sub-region 1 simply  ratify the status quo.  Putting a new label on these already-protected waters is  politically popular, but we all should expect more.   
To give you a sense of usage,  members of Sail Rock Ranch took fewer than 10 rockfish in 2007.  Following  termination of the nearshore longlining program of the 1990’s, rockfish are  recovering.  The urchin fishery has all but disappeared from its levels of the  90s, from 20 plus boats down to one or two in this  sub-region.
To assist with modeling, we provided the latitude coordinates of these already-protected areas...
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment